Abstract
This chapter defends Kant's claim that aesthetic and teleological judgments are both differing types of what he calls reflective judgements. It discusses that Nietzsche's reading of the Critique of Judgement was a vital influence on Birth of Tragedy. It also provides a brief account of the Critique of Judgement, hewing more closely to Kant's intentions in the third Critique. It explains that Kant's Critique of Judgement, like all of Kant's works shows an architectonic penchant. It discusses that the first Critique prepares the way for a metaphysics of morals. It also talks about Kant's identification of the correct inference-drawing faculty with the scientific theory producing faculty which he calls ‘reason’.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
