Abstract
In the later eighteenth century two schemes were introduced in Parliament for extending the practice of handing over the bodies of executed offenders to anatomists for dissection. Both measures were motivated by the needs of anatomy - including the improvement of surgical skill, the development of medical teaching in the provinces, and for conducting public anatomical demonstrations. Yet both failed to pass into law due to concerns about the possibly damaging effects in terms of criminal justice. Through a detailed analysis of the origins and progress of these two parliamentary measures - a moment when the competing claims of anatomy and criminal justice vied for supremacy over the criminal corpse - the following article sheds light on judicial attitudes to dissection as a method of punishment and adds to our understanding of why the dread of dissection would come to fall upon the dead poor (rather than executed offenders) in the nineteenth century.
Highlights
On Friday, 12 May 1786, the distinguished philanthropist and social reformer, William Wilberforce, stood up before the House of Commons
Just ten years later, in March 1796, the backbench MP Richard Jodrell put it to Parliament that a bill be introduced for punishing criminals executed for burglary and highway robbery with anatomization and dissection.[3]. In this instance the motion was immediately dropped following widespread opposition from MPs in the Commons. Both these legislative efforts in the later eighteenth century to extend the practice of dissecting offenders were decisively motivated by the needs of medical science, yet each failed to reach the statute books due to concerns about the damaging effects the measures would have in terms of criminal justice
The later eighteenth century represents a particular moment when the competing claims of anatomy and criminal justice vied for supremacy over the criminal corpse
Summary
On Friday, 12 May 1786, the distinguished philanthropist and social reformer, William Wilberforce, stood up before the House of Commons.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
