Abstract

Abstract. Tectonic reconstructions of Southeast Asia have given rise to numerous controversies that include the accretionary history of Sundaland and the enigmatic tectonic origin of the proto-South China Sea. We assimilate a diversity of geological and geophysical observations into a new regional plate model, coupled to a global model, to address these debates. Our approach takes into account terrane suturing and accretion histories, the location of subducted slabs imaged in mantle tomography in order to constrain the evolution of regional subduction zones, as well as plausible absolute and relative plate velocities and tectonic driving mechanisms. We propose a scenario of rifting from northern Gondwana in the latest Jurassic, driven by northward slab pull from north-dipping subduction of Tethyan crust beneath Eurasia, to detach East Java, Mangkalihat, southeast Borneo and West Sulawesi blocks that collided with a Tethyan intra-oceanic subduction zone in the mid-Cretaceous and subsequently accreted to the Sunda margin (i.e., southwest Borneo core) in the Late Cretaceous. In accounting for the evolution of plate boundaries, we propose that the Philippine Sea plate originated on the periphery of Tethyan crust forming this northward conveyor. We implement a revised model for the Tethyan intra-oceanic subduction zones to reconcile convergence rates, changes in volcanism and the obduction of ophiolites. In our model the northward margin of Greater India collides with the Kohistan–Ladakh intra-oceanic arc at ∼53 Ma, followed by continent–continent collision closing the Shyok and Indus–Tsangpo suture zones between ∼42 and 34 Ma. We also account for the back-arc opening of the proto-South China Sea from ∼65 Ma, consistent with extension along east Asia and the formation of supra-subduction zone ophiolites presently found on the island of Mindoro. The related rifting likely detached the Semitau continental fragment from South China, which accreted to northern Borneo in the mid-Eocene, to account for the Sarawak Orogeny. Rifting then re-initiated along southeast China by 37 Ma to open the South China Sea, resulting in the complete consumption of proto-South China Sea by ∼17 Ma when the collision of the Dangerous Grounds and northern Palawan blocks with northern Borneo choked the subduction zone to result in the Sabah Orogeny and the obduction of ophiolites in Palawan and Mindoro. We conclude that the counterclockwise rotation of Borneo was accommodated by oroclinal bending consistent with paleomagnetic constraints, the curved lithospheric lineaments observed in gravity anomalies of the Java Sea and the curvature of the Cretaceous Natuna paleo-subduction zone. We complete our model by constructing a time-dependent network of topological plate boundaries and gridded paleo-ages of oceanic basins, allowing us to compare our plate model evolution to seismic tomography. In particular, slabs observed at depths shallower than ∼1000 km beneath northern Borneo and the South China Sea are likely to be remnants of the proto-South China Sea basin.

Highlights

  • Southeast Asia is an accretionary mosaic of continental fragments, seamounts, exotic terranes and intra-oceanic island arcs that were welded to the Asian continent, presently delineated by suture zones and remnants of ancient Tethyan and proto-Pacific ocean basins that once separated them (Stauffer, 1983; Sengör et al, 1988; Veevers, 2004; Metcalfe, 2011) (Fig. 1)

  • We find the seismic line data and timings of major regional events from Schlüter et al (1996) helpful, we fundamentally disagree with the mechanism that is proposed for South China Sea opening as a back arc, and we prefer that the South China Sea opens initially as a pull-apart basin resulting from the combination of extrusion tectonics acting on the South China and Indochina blocks, and the south-dipping subduction of the proto-South China Sea along northern Borneo (Briais et al, 1993)

  • We propose that Mindoro and Palawan were rifted from mainland South China in the latest Cretaceous, with seafloor spreading being established in the back arc by 59 Ma to emplace the Sibuyan and Amnay ophiolites, which were later obducted and accreted to Luzon (Fig. 1b)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Southeast Asia is an accretionary mosaic of continental fragments, seamounts, exotic terranes and intra-oceanic island arcs that were welded to the Asian continent, presently delineated by suture zones and remnants of ancient Tethyan and proto-Pacific ocean basins that once separated them (Stauffer, 1983; Sengör et al, 1988; Veevers, 2004; Metcalfe, 2011) (Fig. 1). The tectonic framework of Southeast Asia is inherited from the long-term convergence between the Australian, (proto-)Pacific and Eurasian plates and the cyclical Gondwana-derived terrane detachment and subsequent accretion onto Eurasia and the Sundaland core Sea – Solomon Sea, SPK – Sepik, SPT – Sabah–Palawan Trough, STr – Sorol Trough, Sul – Sulawesi, SuS – Sulu Sea, TPAA – Torricelli–Prince Alexander Arc, WB – West Burma, WCT – W Caroline Trough, YTr – Yap Trough

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call