Abstract
In a number of high-profile cases, the Court of Justice has focused its attention on the advertising function of a trade mark. Some have seen this as giving overly-wide protection to trade mark owners at the expense of their competitors and free speech. An analysis of the Court of Justice's trade mark jurisprudence on topical issues including parallel importation, dilution and advertising keywords reveals that the Court has been willing to recognise that trade marks have an advertising function as a matter of principle. However, in practice, it has been reluctant to actually recognise that that advertising function has been harmed. Concentrating on harm to the advertising function is most likely a false target. Instead, attention should be focussed on unfair advantage which is likely to lead to wider, and potentially unbalanced, trade mark protection.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
