Abstract
persons or persons with 'protected interests.' Nor does it involve a lot of ad hoc reasoning whenever new factual situations are confronted. Nor does it involve a denial that policy is at the root of all decisions in this area, no matter what language is used to disguise this fact. On the contrary, what this analysis of Marc Rich does do is emphasise that no matter how much judges and others may make protestations to the contrary, they cannot help but give effect to a more or less consistent policy in which theyalbeit perhaps subconsciously-strongly believe. And so it should be, for if no consistent patterns of judicial behaviour were there to be discovered, how could lawyers ever hope to advise their clients more accurately than could be done by the lay passengers on the Clapham omnibus?
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
