Abstract

Although online courses are becoming increasingly popular in higher education, evidence is inconclusive regarding whether online students are likely to be as academically successful and motivated as students in face-to-face courses. In this study, we documented online and face-to-face students’ academic motivation and outcomes in community college mathematics courses, and whether differences might vary based on student characteristics (i.e., gender, underrepresented ethnic/racial minority status, first-generation college status, and adult learner status). Over 2,400 developmental mathematics students reported on their math motivation at the beginning (Week 1) and middle (Weeks 3, 5) of the semester. Findings indicated that online students received lower grades and were less likely to pass from their courses than face-to-face students, with online adult learners receiving particularly low final course grades and pass rates. In contrast, online and face-to-face students did not differ on incoming motivation, with subgroup analyses suggesting largely similar patterns of motivation across student groups. Together, findings suggest that online and face-to-face students may differ overall in academic outcomes but not in their motivation or differentially based on student characteristics. Small but significant differences on academic outcomes across modalities (Cohen’s ds = 0.17–0.28) have implications for community college students’ success in online learning environments, particularly for adult learners who are most likely to be faced with competing demands.

Highlights

  • Online courses are increasingly popular in higher education, with over 3 million students nationwide having participated in at least one online course (Bennett and Monds, 2008; Green and Wagner, 2011)

  • Given the increasing popularity and contradictory evidence associated with online learning, it is critical to understand who is likely to be successful in online courses and the underlying mechanisms that may explain differential success

  • We focused on developmental mathematics courses, which are designed for students who place below college-level math, because they are characterized by notoriously low pass rates and serve as a significant barrier to degree completion (Bailey et al, 2010; Hughes and Scott-Clayton, 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Online courses are increasingly popular in higher education, with over 3 million students nationwide having participated in at least one online course (Bennett and Monds, 2008; Green and Wagner, 2011). Growing access to online learning holds promise for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) education, as online math and science courses augment both the number and diversity of students entering into STEM majors (Drew et al, 2015). There is Motivation in Online Developmental Math contradictory evidence on whether students fare well in online courses as they do in face-to-face courses. Given the increasing popularity and contradictory evidence associated with online learning, it is critical to understand who is likely to be successful in online courses and the underlying mechanisms that may explain differential success

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call