The costs and benefits of cross-level quality control rules

Abstract

BackgroundQuality is often monitored by multi-rule schemes that are applied at each level of QC material. Cross Level (CL) quality control rules have been proposed but have not been investigated. MethodsWe used computer simulation to study the impact of CL rules on time to detection and the false positive rate in a system using multirules (3–1s, 2–2s, 4–1s, and 10x) with 2 levels of QC material We also studied the effect of correlation between shifts at each level. The performance of QC policies was compared using simulation analysis. We also compared the detection rates of QC policies (with and without QC rules) using laboratory QC data. ResultsImplementing the CL rule increased the false positive rate and increased the detection rate for small shifts (around 1 standard deviation). CL rules had a greater impact when the correlation of shifts between levels was high. ConclusionsCL rules have the potential to increase detection rates, but also increase false positive rates. It is difficult to identify the circumstances where the benefits of increased detection outweigh the costs of false positives. Alternative approaches to QC should be explored.