The Costly and Demanding—Exploring Solution-Based Othering of ‘Non-European Immigrants’ in Norwegian Policy Recommendations

Søren Mosgaard Andreasen

doi:10.7557/13.5018

Abstract

This article examines the Norwegian scholarly report titled NOU 2017:2—Integration and Trust: Long-Term Consequences of High Immigration (English translation; chapter 1.1) to unpack how ‘non-European immigrants’ are constructed as an economic and social challenge for the welfare state. Principles from discourse theory (DT) and the conceptual framework of othering are applied to discuss how the designation of this category of people as objects of qualification/integration may serve to reify racialized relations of inferiorized difference between white Norwegian majorities and societal newcomers from the Global South. The author tracks this dynamic to a discourse in which the relationship between the Norwegian state and immigrants from countries outside of Europe is organized as a binary opposition between a vulnerable self and an overwhelming, inherently faceless ‘other’. It is suggested that the othering enabled in the NOU (Norges Offentlige Utredninger) report can be viewed as a specific production of monstrosity: a horror-vision of a failing, unintegrated welfare state that needs safeguarding against abnormal, ‘huge waves’ of immigrants from ‘further south’. The argument is finally presented that the report’s vision of integration, by being coded with the logic of presenting a necessary response to an existential threat to welfare state structures, engenders a precarious form of social distancing that is theorized as solution-based othering.

Highlights

A critique does not consist in saying that things aren’t good the way they are
The report raises questions about causal relations between complex social phenomena such as public trust and ‘cultural differences’. It brings up questions about how othering may emerge as a byproduct of the very discursive processes used to designate refugees and ‘non-European immigrants’ as objects of integration, qualification, and so-called safeguarding mechanisms deemed crucial for the continued existence of the Norwegian model
This article has examined how NEI identities and their relation to the Norwegian welfare state are conceptualized in the Norges Offentlige Utredninger (NOU) 2017:2 report

Summary

Introduction

A critique does not consist in saying that things aren’t good the way they are. It consists in seeing on just what type of assumptions, of familiar notions, of established and unexamined ways of thinking the accepted practices are based [...]. I discuss how the discourse of (dis)qualification may be understood as a securitization move by framing NEIs, and the challenge of integration, as an existential threat to welfare state structures.

Results

Conclusion