Abstract
Carbon costs of synthesis are quite similar among parts and species of tundra plants and among chaparral shrubs, because all plant parts have substantial concentrations of certain energetically expensive constituents (either lignin or protein and tannin). I found no evidence to support the generalization that evergreen leaves are more expensive to produce than deciduous leaves. In contrast to carbon, initial nitrogen and phosphorus costs of synthesis differ substantially among plant parts and species. These costs are higher in leaves than in stems and tend to decrease from deciduous shrubs and forbs to graminoids to evergreen shrubs to mosses to lichens. Nutrient costs also vary substantially among species within a growth form. Final nitrogen and phosphorus costs are much less than initial costs because of resorption from senescing parts, whereas final carbon costs are not greatly modified by resorption. Carbon and nutrient costs are completely interconvertible, if their exchange ratios are known. However...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.