Abstract
Auditing standards instruct external auditors to read public information to mitigate management’s information advantage in hiding earnings management and fraud. The transparency of this information, and thus the cost of becoming informed using public information, varies across firms. We argue this cost of becoming informed creates an opportunity for earnings management, increasing audit risk. This study finds that higher costs of becoming informed are related to higher audit fees. In addition, we show that executive equity risk-taking incentives and an attitude towards aggressive reporting exacerbate the effect of the cost of becoming informed on audit fees, suggesting complementary effects of these fraud dimensions on audit pricing. These results are more likely due to audit firms charging risk premiums rather than doing additional audit work. This paper contributes to recent research on the costs of becoming informed and to research on the relation between management compensation and auditor compensation.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.