Abstract
This study estimated costs incurred by agricultural producers to coexist with wildlife in Colorado, where there is little data, and demonstrates that secondary data sources can provide reliable estimates. Three secondary sources were used: government expenditures, spatial data (e.g., geographic information systems), and published studies. Results showed that secondary data provide comparable estimates to more expensive and time consuming surveys. Costs covered by the government sum to $14,478,523. Total costs increase to $77,162,499 when farm and ranch costs that are not reported to the government are included (e.g., property damage, opportunity costs, prevention, and management). These results inform policy makers and producers alike about the value that agricultural stewardship provides wildlife. Results also provide evidence that secondary data sources are a cost-effective, powerful approach that can supplement surveys.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.