The cost-effectiveness of ESBL detection: towards molecular detection methods?

Abstract

Correct detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) is crucial for infection control and antibiotic choice. We performed a study to determine the cost-effectiveness of phenotypical testing, which can be inaccurate, and genotypical tests, which are considered to be more reliable but also more expensive. All patients that had been in isolation in the Amphia hospital because of the detection of ESBL according to the ESBL Etest were included in the survey. All strains were retested using the double disk confirmation test (DDCT) and a genotypical method. This was a commercially available microarray (Check-Points). Discordant results were confirmed by PCR and sequencing. In total 174 patients were included. In 24 of 174 (14%) patients, ESBL carriage could not be confirmed with the microarray. This was verified with PCR and sequencing. The mean duration of isolation was 15 days, adding up to a total number of isolation days of 2571. False-positive results according to the microarray resulted in a total of 279 days of unnecessary isolation for the Etest and 151 days for the DDCT. Using Etest to detect the presence of ESBL results in a false-positive outcome in 14% of the cases. This results in unnecessary isolation of patients, which can be omitted by using a genotypic method.