Abstract

The Correlational Agreement Coefficient, CA(≤, D), was introduced by J.F.J. van Leeuwe in 1974 within Item Tree Analysis (ITA), a data-analytic method to derive quasi orders (surmise relations) on sets of bi-valued test items. Recently, it has become of interest in connection with Knowledge Space Theory (KST). The coefficient CA(≤, D) is used as a descriptive goodness-of-fit measure to select out of competing surmise relations one with maximal CA(≤, D) value. Formal aspects like boundedness, decomposition, and the interplay between consistency of a surmise relation (with a binary data matrix) and the attainment of the maximum value of CA(≤, D) are investigated. Dependence of CA(≤, D) on trivial response patterns is quantified by a functional relationship that allows one to bunch the impact of trivial response patterns in a single “bias term”. These considerations should warn against inconsiderate use of the coefficient. Mathematical reasons for failed, however, heuristically plausible, properties are presented.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call