The correlation of ESC 2016 diastolic guidelines with invasively measured left ventricular filling pressure

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Public hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Al-mouwasat University Hospital, University Heart Surgery Center in Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic. Background left ventricular (LV) diastolic function and filling pressure assessment is a challenge. ESC 2016 diastolic guidelines handles with this issue. Validation of and comparing the correlation between this guidelines and invasively measured different waves may add a step forward in the assessment, prognosis and treatment of LV diastolic function by echo. Purpose this study validates of the correlation of ESC 2016 left ventricular filling pressure echo guidelines with invasively measured left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and left ventricular pre-a. Methods 124 patients who accepted to participate for this study underwent transthoracic echocardiography immediately before left heart catheterization. This study obtained echo parameters to assess LV filling pressure according to ESC 2016 algorithms. It also obtained left ventricular end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) and LV pre-a waves during catheterization. It analyzed the data and compared the results. Results Correlations of grading system (normal, abnormal parameters 1,2 and 3 present) with LV pre-a and LVEDP waves were (P= < 0.0001 r = 0.47, P = 0.0027 r = 0.41), respectively. After excluding group of patients with only one abnormal parameter as indeterminate group, pressure assessment guidelines correlations with the presence of LV pre-a and LVEDP waves were (P = 0.0009 OR = 31.76, p= 0.0170 OR = 36.00), respectively. Means difference of LV pre-a and LVEDP waves between pressure guidelines presence and absence two groups were (LV pre-a: 12.72, 7.52, P < 0.0001and LVEDP: 21.03 10.36, P = 0.0043), respectively. All results are summarized in (Table:1 + 2+3 + 4+5). Conclusion ESC 2016 guidelines pressure assessment correlated strongly with both LV pre-a and LVEDP waves which means that the higher the number of abnormal echo parameters is resulted by echo guidelines, the higher the LV pre-a or LVEDP is presented invasively. Different approaches had different diagnostic accuracy, the best specific was cutoff≥ 2 abnormal echo parameters and the best sensitive and overall accuracy was still cutoff≥2 but after excluding only one abnormal echo parameter group as indeterminate group. The difference between means between echo guidelines pressure assessment was more significant statistically in LV pre-a wave than in LVEDP. Abstract Figure. Abstract Figure.