Abstract
This study aims to determine the correlation between ability of scientific argumentation and learning outcomes of students on the virus topic with the research subjects were X IPA students in SMA Negeri 1 Indralaya Utara 2018/2019 (n = 47). This type of research is quantitative descriptive with the correlation method. This study used two data collection techniques is written test and observation. The result showed that students learning was 49% very good, 15% good, 17% sufficient, and 19% less. The results of writing scientific argumentation of students are 9% excellent, 11% good, 21% sufficient, 26% less, and 33% very poor. The average scientific argumentation of students based on Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP) is 100% of students able to submit a claim, 5% able to submit data, 77% able to convey a warrant, 6% able to convey backing, 7% able to convey rebuttal and 3% able to convey qualifer with the quality of scientific argumentation in general at level 2. The results of the correlation test of scientific argumentation include writing argumentation and TAP with learning outcomes is 0,311 it is means a low correlation. Based on the results showed a correlation between the ability of scientific argumentation with learning outcomes of class x students in SMA Negeri 1 Indralaya Utara
Highlights
National education functions to develop capabilities and shape the nation's character and civilization with dignity in order to educate the life of the nation, aiming at developing the potential of students to become human beings who believe in and fear God Almighty, have noble, healthy, knowledgeable, capable, creative, independent, and become a democratic and responsible country (Law no 20 of 2003 chapter 2 article 3 of the national education system)
The instrument of scientific argumentation ability was a test item in the form of a description in 3 questions with answers referring to Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP), namely claim, data, warrant, backing, rebuttal and qualifer
This is in line with research conducted by Saleh, et al (2017) that the teacher's teaching style will affect student learning outcomes. This means that both students and teachers will influence the learning process
Summary
National education functions to develop capabilities and shape the nation's character and civilization with dignity in order to educate the life of the nation, aiming at developing the potential of students to become human beings who believe in and fear God Almighty, have noble, healthy, knowledgeable, capable, creative, independent , and become a democratic and responsible country (Law no 20 of 2003 chapter 2 article 3 of the national education system). The 2013 curriculum requires students to be active, creative and innovative in the learning process as well as the presence of competencies in accordance with the demands of the functions and objectives of national education (Kurniasih and Bani, 2014). Related to the existence of these competencies, every graduate of primary and secondary education units must have competencies in three aspects namely cognitive, affective, and psychomotor (Hamdani, Prayitno, & Karyanto, 2020; Kemendikbud, 2016). These three dimensions can be achieved through the learning process (Fajar et al, 2020)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
