Abstract

BackgroundThe aim of this study was to determine if there was a difference between coronary reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction and open coronary reimplantation technique in arterial switch operation (ASO).MethodsA total of 236 patients who underwent ASO from March 1994 to August 2018 were enrolled in this study. Multivariate analysis was performed for postoperative early mortality. Patients were divided into the open coronary reimplantation and coronary reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction groups. The 30-day mortality, intraoperative and postoperative coronary artery (CA) revisions, CA–related late morbidity and mortality, and early and late neoaortic valve regurgitations after ASO were compared between the two groups.ResultsOverall postoperative early mortality was 7.2% (17/236). Patients who underwent open coronary reimplantation had higher early mortality as compared with those who underwent coronary reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction. Risk factors for postoperative early mortality from multivariate analysis were cardiopulmonary bypass time and open coronary reimplantation. There was a higher incidence of CA–related late mortality or morbidity in the open coronary reimplantation group. The open coronary reimplantation group had a higher incidence of intraoperative or postoperative CA revision. There were no differences in the incidence of mild or more neoaortic valve regurgitation at discharge or in the 5-year freedom from mild or more neoaortic valve regurgitation.ConclusionsCA reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction yields better results in mortality and intraoperative or postoperative CA–related problems in ASO without increasing postoperative neoaortic valve regurgitation.

Highlights

  • The aim of this study was to determine if there was a difference between coronary reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction and open coronary reimplantation technique in arterial switch operation (ASO)

  • We evaluated the outcome of the ASO and compared the outcome of the two techniques in terms of 30-day operative mortality, CArelated early and late problems, and neoaortic valve regurgitation to determine if there was a difference between coronary reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction (CRANR) and open coronary reimplanation (OCR)

  • We evaluated the risk factors of 30-day mortality through multivariate analysis of several variables and compared the incidence of the intraoperative and postoperative coronary artery (CA) revisions, CA-related late morbidity and Statistical analysis Data analyses were performed with SPSS version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of this study was to determine if there was a difference between coronary reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction and open coronary reimplantation technique in arterial switch operation (ASO). Jatene et al [1] used coronary artery (CA) reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction in their first ASO. We reported better results of coronary reimplantation after neoaortic reconstruction (CRANR) in 2005 [4]. Many pediatric cardiac surgeons are currently using the open coronary reimplanation (OCR) technique. We evaluated the outcome of the ASO and compared the outcome of the two techniques in terms of 30-day operative mortality, CArelated early and late problems, and neoaortic valve regurgitation to determine if there was a difference between CRANR and OCR

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call