Abstract
Discussions concerning Prime Minister—cabinet relations have rarely been elevated above the issue of whether prime-ministerial government or — more recently — presidentialism has replaced cabinet government (see Thomas 1998). It is hard to question Peter Hennessy’s view (1994: 437) that the debate is one of most ‘pronounced sufferers’ of the malaise of ‘premature staleness’ that affects topics of academic debate. In fact, the debate is essentially irresolvable, because its participants believe that power can be fixed to the cabinet or the Prime Minister, and therefore fail to understand the complexities of core executive relations. This chapter will break out of the intellectual impasse, by not focusing on the personality of the Prime Minister. Rather, it will argue that: the Prime Minister operates in a context that is structured by institutions and outside political and economic factors; the Prime Minister has more resources than other actors but is dependent on other actors and resource exchanges to achieve goals; other actors and institutions within the core executive have resources; because the Prime Minister is dependent on other actors, his or her success depends to some extent on strategies and tactics.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.