The coral Oculina patagonica holobiont and its response to confinement, temperature, and Vibrio infections

Abstract

BackgroundExtensive research on the diversity and functional roles of the microorganisms associated with reef-building corals has been promoted as a consequence of the rapid global decline of coral reefs attributed to climate change. Several studies have highlighted the importance of coral‐associated algae (Symbiodinium) and bacteria and their potential roles in promoting coral host fitness and survival. However, the complex coral holobiont extends beyond these components to encompass other entities such as protists, fungi, and viruses. While each constituent has been individually investigated in corals, a comprehensive understanding of their collective roles is imperative for a holistic comprehension of coral health and resilience.ResultsThe metagenomic analysis of the microbiome of the coral Oculina patagonica has revealed that fungi of the genera Aspergillus, Fusarium, and Rhizofagus together with the prokaryotic genera Streptomyces, Pseudomonas, and Bacillus were abundant members of the coral holobiont. This study also assessed changes in microeukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral communities under three stress conditions: aquaria confinement, heat stress, and Vibrio infections. In general, stress conditions led to an increase in Rhodobacteraceae, Flavobacteraceae, and Vibrionaceae families, accompanied by a decrease in Streptomycetaceae. Concurrently, there was a significant decline in both the abundance and richness of microeukaryotic species and a reduction in genes associated with antimicrobial compound production by the coral itself, as well as by Symbiodinium and fungi.ConclusionOur findings suggest that the interplay between microeukaryotic and prokaryotic components of the coral holobiont may be disrupted by stress conditions, such as confinement, increase of seawater temperature, or Vibrio infection, leading to a dysbiosis in the global microbial community that may increase coral susceptibility to diseases. Further, microeukaryotic community seems to exert influence on the prokaryotic community dynamics, possibly through predation or the production of secondary metabolites with anti-bacterial activity.5jxNwVcR-vUc4t1YJ-ryphVideo