Abstract

(1) Background: The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was introduced in 2018, bringing an organ-specific classification system for salivary gland cytopathology. The aim of present study is to evaluate the MSRSGC prospectively, based on a two-year experience in the tertiary care center pathology department, and evaluate the role of routine cell block (CB) preparation in salivary gland cytopathological diagnostics. (2) Methods: In our institution, the Department of Pathology, Fimlab Laboratories, Tampere, Finland, the MSRSGC has been implemented in salivary gland cytopathology since January 2018 and, over a two-year period (January 2018–December 2019), there were 365 fine-needle aspirations, of which 164 had a surgical follow-up. The CB methods used were Plasma-thrombin, the collection of visible fragments, and the Shandon and in-house methods. (3) Results: The MSRSGC diagnostic figures were as follows: accuracy 87.5%, sensitivity 45.8% and specificity 98.9%. For diagnostic categories of MSRSGC (non-neoplastic, benign neoplasm and malignant neoplasm) (n = 63) diagnostic accuracy was 98.4%, and for undetermined categories (atypia of undetermined significance, salivary gland neoplasm of uncertain malignant potential and suspicious for malignancy) (n = 49) diagnostic accuracy was 73.5%. Non-contributory cell blocks resulted more often in a false negative diagnosis (25%, 3/12) than a true negative diagnosis (10%, 7/73, p < 0.001), and is, most likely, an insufficient cytological diagnosis (86%, 18/21, p < 0.001). (4) Conclusion: The application of MSRSGC and CBs are beneficial in salivary gland cytological diagnosis, increasing diagnostic accuracy and, thus, patients’ management and treatment.

Highlights

  • The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was introduced in 2018 following other organ specific cytopathological reporting

  • The study material consisted of all salivary gland fine needle aspirations during a two-year-period from January 2018 until December 2019, which were searched from an electronic pathology database

  • Categorization was carried out for this study as follows: non-contributory cell block (CB) were mainly acellular or of low cellularity with no impact on final diagnosis; CBs supporting the diagnosis usually contained the same or similar diagnostic elements as cytological preparation; and CBs crucial for diagnosis consisted of material that gave diagnostic information superior to the information revealed from cytological preparation

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (MSRSGC) was introduced in 2018 following other organ specific cytopathological reporting. It aimed for better patient care, bringing a practical, evidence-based, user-friendly classification system with characterization and management algorithms [1,2]. Cell blocks (CBs) are a collection of sediments and visible pieces of tissue from cytological specimens that are concentrated and processed into paraffin blocks, and stained with hematoxylin-eosinike surgical specimens. Cytological material is triaged, and one of the following CB methods is applied: the plasma-thrombin method, the collection of visible tissue fragments, the in-house method [8,11] or the Shandon method

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call