Abstract

Resident physicians play a double role in hospital activity. They participate in medical practices and thus, on the one hand, they should be considered as an input. Also, they are medical staff in training and, on the other hand, must be considered as an output. The net effect on hospital activities should therefore be empirically determined. Additionally, when considering their role as active physicians, a natural hypothesis is that resident physicians are not more productive than senior ones. This is a property that standard logarithmic production functions (including Cobb–Douglas and Translog functional forms) cannot verify for the whole technology set. Our main contribution is the development of a Translog modification, which implies the definition of the input “doctors” as a weighted sum of senior and resident physicians, where the weights are estimated from the empirical application. This modification of the standard Translog is able, under suitable parameter restrictions, to verify our main hypothesis across the whole technology set while determining if the net effect of resident physicians in hospitals’ production should be associated to an output or to an input. We estimate the resulting output distance function frontier with a sample of Spanish hospitals. Our findings show that the overall contribution of resident physicians to hospitals’ production allows considering them as an input in most cases. In particular, their average productivity is around 37% of that corresponding to senior physicians.

Highlights

  • In many countries, before becoming a physician, medical students must go through a long training process after completing their medical studies

  • If γ(z) ranges between 0 and 1, resident physicians positively contribute to hospital production services and globally should be considered as an input, but their productivity is lower than that of senior physicians

  • While in the literature there is no consensus as to the specific role of residents in the hospital production process, we argue that they should be considered as both inputs and outputs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Before becoming a physician, medical students must go through a long training process after completing their medical studies. Teaching hospitals provide prospective future doctors with necessary education, which is a public good [1], insofar as well-trained physicians benefit society. In this sense, residents’ productivity has raised interest among economists. Several authors (for example [3,4,5]) model medical residents as outputs, assuming that training introduces more complexity to the activity carried out by senior physicians given that they face the added challenge of training student doctors. Residents have been considered as inputs in the literature, given their active participation in clinical practice [6, 7] or [8]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call