Abstract
Innovation in physical distribution (PD) is easily copied, so best practice rapidly achieves universal application and thus PD becomes a commodity back-office function. However, as a core component of the supply chain, PD is wrapped up in the current paradigm of "competing supply chains". Competing firms, therefore, tend to run competing PD systems even though logic suggests that to remove PD from the competitive arena may unlock inter-firm efficiencies and thus cost savings. The reasons why this logic is ignored include branding, organisational cultures of control, market aggression and reluctance to disagregate vertically systems which were assembled during periods of innovative development. Whilst there are clearly supply chain elements that continue to contribute to competitive edge, such as range, product development, procurement and replenishment strategies and information systems, is it now the case that better value can be delivered for customers through the horizontal integration of competing distribution systems? These issues are explored through research in the UK food retailing industry, with the conclusion that a combination of certain circumstances, in the presence of given enablers, may remove distribution systems from the competitive arena.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.