Abstract

Background: Disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) inequalities by socioeconomic deprivation are widening, alongside rising prevalence of multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs). We use longitudinal data to assess whether MLTCs contribute to the widening DFLE inequalities by socioeconomic deprivation.Methods: The Cognitive Function and Ageing Studies (CFAS I and II) are large population-based studies of those ≥65 years, conducted in three areas in England. Baseline occurred in 1991 (CFAS I, n=7635) and 2011 (CFAS II, n=7762) with two-year follow-up. We defined disability as difficulty in activities of daily living, MLTCs as the presence of at least two of nine health conditions, and socioeconomic deprivation by area-level deprivation tertiles. DFLE and transitions between disability states and death were estimated from multistate models.Findings: For people with MLTCs, inequalities in DFLE at age 65 between the most and least affluent widened to around 2.5 years (men:2.4 years, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.4–4.4; women:2.6 years, 95%CI 0.7–4.5) by 2011. Incident disability reduced for the most affluent women (Relative Risk Ratio (RRR):0.6, 95%CI 0.4–0.9), and mortality with disability reduced for least affluent men (RRR:0.6, 95%CI 0.5–0.8). MLTCs prevalence increased only for least affluent men (1991: 58.8%, 2011: 66.9%) and women (1991: 60.9%, 2011: 69.1%). However, DFLE inequalities were as large in people without MLTCs (men:2.4 years, 95%CI 0.3–4.5; women:3.1 years, 95% CI 0.8–5.4).Interpretation: Widening DFLE inequalities were not solely due to MLTCs. Reduced disability incidence with MLTCs is possible but was only achieved in the most affluent.

Highlights

  • Research in contextEvidence before this studyAfter searching multiple databases, one cross-sectional and six longitudinal panel studies of moderate quality reported disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) comparisons for multiple longterm conditions (MLTCs) including diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, depression and sensory impairment

  • We found that the least affluent older people with multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) spent a greater proportion of remaining life with disability in 2011 than 1991, providing some evidence that MLTCs may have become more disabling in this group

  • MLTCs may be contributing to the widening LE and Disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) inequalities seen in the UK, it is not the full story, as DFLE inequalities for those without MLTCs were of a similar magnitude to those with MLTCs

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research in contextEvidence before this studyAfter searching multiple databases, one cross-sectional and six longitudinal panel studies of moderate quality reported disability-free life expectancy (DFLE) comparisons for multiple longterm conditions (MLTCs) including diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, depression and sensory impairment. Our study is the first to investigate the contribution of MLTCs to widening inequalities in DFLE by socioeconomic deprivation. We use longitudinal data to assess whether MLTCs contribute to the widening DFLE inequalities by socioeconomic deprivation. Findings: For people with MLTCs, inequalities in DFLE at age 65 between the most and least affluent widened to around 2.5 years (men:2.4 years, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) 0.4À4.4; women:2.6 years, 95%CI 0.7À4.5) by 2011. DFLE inequalities were as large in people without MLTCs (men:2.4 years, 95%CI 0.3À4.5; women:3.1 years, 95% CI 0.8À5.4). Interpretation: Widening DFLE inequalities were not solely due to MLTCs. Reduced disability incidence with MLTCs is possible but was only achieved in the most affluent. This research was undertaken within the UK NIHR collaboration for leadership in applied health research and care for Cambridgeshire and Peterborough and the Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre infrastructures, Nottingham city and Nottinghamshire county NHS primary care trusts, and UK NIHR Policy Research Programme, conducted through the NIHR Older People and Frailty Policy Research Unit, PR-PRU-1217-21502

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call