Abstract
More and Machiavelli looked at the same reality from the perspective of their classical background. But for More as for Erasmus and other members of their circle, historical perception included the role of divine Providence in human affairs, capable of manifestations not always evident to human reason, but comprehensible from a Christian perspective. Erasmus’ Education of a Christian Prince and some of the discussions in Book One of Utopia are evidence of a view of Christian values in political matters. More and Machiavelli differed in their use of classical sources. To More, classicism meant a tradition of moral standards that could enhance a Christian education and a Christian governance. In modern political theories, whereas More has become a point of reference of a statesman’s action coherent with his religious beliefs, Machiavelli is a constant reminder of the need for moral and religious principles in order to avoid authoritarian and demagogic governments.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
