Abstract

ABSTRACTDespite the broad celebration of Brazil’s urban reform movement, recent events in Brazil have called attention to a paradox focused on the disappointing results of this movement to deal with Brazil’s complex urban context. Taking this “impasse” as a starting point, this article focuses on the role of politics and its relationship to economic interests in urban development in which much decision making around urban policy takes place to understand why Brazil’s progressive legislation has not succeeded in creating a more just and equitable urban environment. Using a case study of the city of Niterói, I show that patterns of state and nonstate actors are connected through both formal and informal relationships, and connections between public and private actors have a considerable impact on urban politics and policies. Focusing on the limits of participatory processes in Niterói, I call attention to the contradictions of participatory planning in Brazil.

Highlights

  • In the Brazil of the 1980s and 1990s, urban movements fought to advance the right to access urban land as a key claim of citizenship in Brazil’s democratization agenda

  • Fostering urban reform in the constitution-building process, this movement coalesced into a “popular democratic forum,” reconceptualizing inequitable land structures through participatory planning around three axes: (a) tenure security for low-income residents; (b) intervention in real estate speculation; and (c) the democratization of urban decision-making processes for direct participation (Rolnik, 2013)

  • The urban reform movement has been broadly celebrated for its success in proposing a rights-based paradigm for urban development (Fernandes, 2011)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the Brazil of the 1980s and 1990s, urban movements fought to advance the right to access urban land as a key claim of citizenship in Brazil’s democratization agenda. The Brazilian case has been recognized given its approach as a democratic project to change the role of planning, the state, and social actors in governing cities based on social justice.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call