Abstract
Our research began with interviews of experienced attorneys who prosecute and defend civil rights and employment discrimination cases. We set out to determine the extent to which offers of judgment under Federal of Civil Procedure (FRCP 68 or Rule 68) are made in these type of cases and the reasons why that is or is not used. We focused on civil rights and employment discrimination litigation because it is in those cases where has the greatest potential to stimulate an early resolution of the dispute. provides the offeror greater leverage in civil rights and employment discrimination cases than in most other types of civil litigation, because the potential sanction to the prevailing offeree who turns down and fails to improve upon the offer includes the forfeiture of post-offer statutory attorneys' fees. And in these cases, fees often constitute the greater part of a plaintiff's recovery.In this, our second report, we discuss how might be amended to make it a more effective tool for stimulating the prompt and fair resolution of civil rights and employment discrimination actions. Our suggested potential amendments are drawn largely, but not entirely, from two sources: the comments and suggestions made by the attorneys we interviewed, and the practices that have evolved in states that have similar provisions in their respective rules of civil procedure. In very broad terms, we discuss (1) having a separately numbered subdivision of the for cases arising under federal fee-shifting statutes; (2) modifying the terminology of to describe more explicitly the mechanics and sanctions of the Rule; (3) allowing plaintiffs, not just defendants, to initiate offers under a two-way rule; (4) devising a set of incentives and sanctions calculated to promote the timely and fair resolution of disputes without unduly threatening either party; and (5) incorporating time frames for making and responding to offers.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.