Abstract

It is argued that the concept of non-marriage, referring to religious marriages that are neither valid or void, and incomplete in terms of adhering to the formalities of marriage—must be recognised in law. However, the application of this category, in recent years, especially to British Muslim nikah-only marriages seems “inappropriate”, especially when the factual matrix is taken into account. This article will analyse the current usage of non-marriage declarations by the English court and make the case for reverting back to the position taken by Justice Bodey in the case of Hudson v Leigh (Status of non-marriage) [2009] EWHC 1306 (Fam), which has more recently been the position taken in Akhter v Khan [2018] EWFC 54. Empirical research continues to demonstrate that for British Muslims, the traditional form of religious marriage remains vital not only for the partners themselves, but for their families and extended community network. For any proposed changes to marriage laws to be effective, the issue of what is meaningful to all those involved must be taken into account. This article suggests that, in the interim, a simple mechanism in the form of cohabitation rights recognition could put an end to the injustices and indeed the advantageous status that non-marriage affords one party during martial breakdown.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.