Abstract
The subject of this paper is the content of real debt, potentially a new institute in Serbian law de lege ferenda. The author of the paper, using the comparative method explores the similarities and differences of one segment of the German regulation of land debt and regulation of real debt from the text of the Draft Law on Property and Other Proprietary Rights in Serbia. The author estimates that there are fundamental differences of land debt and real debt in relation to the mortgage (as the most similar institute of domestic law): non-accessoriness and multifunctionality. These real debt features affect the realization of settlement right, making the contents of this institute different from mortgage, suggesting the expediency of introducing real debt in the future Serbian law.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
