Abstract
In this paper six attempts to periodise economic life are distinguished—those due to Gibson and Horvath, Kleinknecht, Lash and Urry, Lipietz, Mandel, and Piore and Sabel. The aspects of the economy that they analyse, the type of period they describe, the spaces associated with the periods, and the processes of transition are contrasted. The theories differently explain the economic slowdown of the 1970s and 1980s, and crucial distinctions are: whether the productivity slowdown is a cause or a consequence, what factors determine changes in profitability, and the role of newly industrialising countries. It is argued that recent phases in economic life can more accurately be interpreted as waves or cycles than as periods. The paper concludes with an assessment of the capacities of the theories to incorporate a role for space and to interpret the contemporary transition.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
