Abstract

Editor's note: This article was selected as the Best Poster Paper at SEG's 1999 Annual Meeting. Due to its quantitative nature, the 1999 Best Student Poster Paper will not be published in TLE but in a future issue of Gℯℴ𝓅𝒽𝓎𝓈𝒾𝒸𝓈, without undergoing peer-review. The goal of a seismic survey is to illuminate subsurface geologic formations that may hold hydrocarbon accumulations. Conventional seismic survey design relies on the assumption that uniform midpoint coverage will lead to uniform illumination in the subsurface as long as each midpoint is hit by a sufficient range of offsets. In areas of complex velocity structure, severe wavefield distortions lead to irregular subsurface illumination patterns, even if surface midpoint maps show a uniform distribution. A more appropriate approach is to design seismic surveys to ensure illumination of key subsurface horizons. The difference between midpoint coverages and subsurface illumination patterns is particularly large in salt-prone areas (Muerdter et al., 1997). Due to severe wave distortion through complex, high-velocity salt bodies, conventional design methods that result in relatively uniform surface coverage (Figure 1) generate uneven amplitudes and shadow zones on subsalt horizons, an effect that is shown clearly by ray-trace modeling of an entire seismic survey (Figure 2). Figure 1. Total hits in each surface bin resulting from a 3-D seismic survey collected along east-west lines. Distances are in kilofeet. Figure 2. Amplitude of a subsurface …

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call