Abstract

Due to the huge differences between the unconventional shale and conventional sand reservoirs in many aspects such as the types and the characteristics of minerals, matrix pores and fluids, the construction of shale rock physics model is significant for the exploration and development of shale reservoirs. To make a better characterization of shale gas-bearing reservoirs, we first propose a new but more suitable rock physics model to characterize the reservoirs. We then use a well A to demonstrate the feasibility and reliability of the proposed rock physics model of shale gas-bearing reservoirs. Moreover, we propose a new brittleness indicator for the high-porosity and organic-rich shale gas-bearing reservoirs. Based on the parameter analysis using the constructed rock physics model, we finally compare the new brittleness indicator with the commonly used Young’s modulus in the content of quartz and organic matter, the matrix porosity, and the types of filled fluids. We also propose a new shale brittleness index by integrating the proposed new brittleness indicator and the Poisson’s ratio. Tests on real data sets demonstrate that the new brittleness indicator and index are more sensitive than the commonly used Young’s modulus and brittleness index for the high-porosity and high-brittleness shale gas-bearing reservoirs.

Highlights

  • Nowadays, the shale gas becomes an important type of energy and accounts for about 50% of unconventional gas resources

  • Rock physics constructs the relationship between the elastic properties (P-wave velocity, S-wave velocity, density, etc.) and underground reservoir parameters, which is the foundation of reservoir prediction and hydrocarbon detection with seismic data

  • Because the area of high porosity, high brittleness, and high gas reservoir can be regarded as the sweet spot of shale gas-bearing reservoirs, we analyze the effects of quartz, porosity, organic matter, and pore fluids to these five parameters of brittleness indicator, including Young’s modulus ( E ), Poisson’s ratio ( ), brittleness index ( BI ), new brittleness indicator ( E∕ ), and new brittleness index ( BINEW)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The shale gas becomes an important type of energy and accounts for about 50% of unconventional gas resources. Wu et al (2012) develop an organic-rich shale anisotropic rock physics model, who mix the kerogen with the other minerals to calculate the effective rock properties. Considering the organic matter content and strong anisotropy characteristics, Qian et al (2016) construct a rock physics model suitable for the shale gas-bearing reservoirs in Southwest China. Goodway et al (2001, 2010) propose a characterization method of rock brittleness based on the product of Lamé constants ( and ) and density (i.e., Lamé impedances, and ) On this basis, Perez and Marfurt (2013) realize the seismic direct inversion of brittleness parameters by using the real data. For the organic-rich and high-porosity shale gas-bearing reservoirs, we propose a new brittleness indicator—E∕ We compare it with the commonly used brittleness indicator—E from both theoretical models and real data sets. In Eqs. (6) and (7), Kd and d are the effective bulk modulus and shear modulus of dry rock with the porosity of ; Km and m are the effective bulk modulus and shear modulus of mineral materials making up rock, respectively; ul is the pore volume fraction; l is the aspect ratio of pores; p and q are the coefficients related to the pore aspect ratio; Tiijj( l) and Tijij( l) are the functions of pore aspect ratio

Gassmann’s equation
Model test
Model analysis of brittleness parameters
Cross‐plots analysis
Well log data analysis
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call