The Construction of a Special Physical Quality Evaluation System for Outstanding Chinese Male Boxers.

Abstract

To construct a structural model of special physical quality test indexes for Chinese outstanding male boxers and to develop comprehensive evaluation criteria for special physical quality of Chinese outstanding male boxers. Expert questionnaire survey method, principal component analysis, and R-type factor analysis were applied in this study. Results of this study include, (1) Through factor analysis, the four types of factors that play a major role for male boxers were strength factor, speed factor, endurance factor, and agility factor in order. (2) Through principal component analysis and R-type factor analysis, the regression equation of the estimated values of the common factors was obtained, and the formula for calculating the comprehensive development level of physical quality of Chinese outstanding male boxers was established through weighting. (3) Through the empirical test, the gap between Level I boxers and boxers at the fitness level was in the endurance and agility dimensions, and Level II boxers were also worse than Level I boxers in the agility dimension, and there was an all-round special physical quality gap between Level II boxers in strength, speed, endurance, and agility and boxers at the fitness level. Conclusion of this study could be summarized as follows: first, the special physical quality index system of Chinese excellent male boxers is: 1 min power sandbag, 20 s straight punch, 9 min double swing jump rope, 1 min front and back hand exchange sandbag 4 items. Second, the standard scores of 4 special physical quality indexes for Chinese outstanding male boxers were developed. Third, the formula for calculating the comprehensive score of special physical quality development level of Chinese excellent male boxers was developed: T = ∑WiTi = 0.367T1 + 0.307T2 + 0.172T3 + 0.154T4. Fourth, the evaluation criteria for the comprehensive physical quality development level of Chinese excellent male boxers were established (T ≥ 72.01 for excellent; 44.6 ≤ T < 72.01 as good; T < 44.6 as poor).