Abstract
THE remarks attributed to me in NATURE of October 13 (p. 219) give an incorrect impression of what I intended to convey to the meeting. The statement that the molecular heats “are inconsistent with the arrangement which has been adopted to account for chemical valency” was not made.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
