Abstract

Surprising invariance relationships have emerged from the study of social interaction, whereby a cancelling‐out of multiple partial effects of genetic, ecological or demographic parameters means that they have no net impact upon the evolution of a social behaviour. Such invariants play a pivotal role in the study of social adaptation: on the one hand, they provide theoretical hypotheses that can be empirically tested; and, on the other hand, they provide benchmark frameworks against which new theoretical developments can be understood. Here we derive a novel invariant for dispersal evolution: the ‘constant philopater hypothesis’ (CPH). Specifically, we find that, irrespective of variation in maternal fecundity, all mothers are favoured to produce exactly the same number of philopatric offspring, with high‐fecundity mothers investing proportionally more, and low‐fecundity mothers investing proportionally less, into dispersing offspring. This result holds for female and male dispersal, under haploid, diploid and haplodiploid modes of inheritance, irrespective of the sex ratio, local resource availability and whether mother or offspring controls the latter's dispersal propensity. We explore the implications of this result for evolutionary conflict of interests – and the exchange and withholding of contextual information – both within and between families, and we show that the CPH is the fundamental invariant that underpins and explains a wider family of invariance relationships that emerge from the study of social evolution.

Highlights

  • A number of surprising invariance relationships have emerged from the study of social evolution, whereby a cancelling-out of multiple partial effects of a genetic, ecological or demographic parameter means that it has no net impact upon the evolution of a social behaviour

  • In the study of sex allocation under ‘local mate competition’ (Hamilton, 1967), the number of sons produced by a mother is expected to be independent of her fecundity, in what is known as the ‘constant male hypothesis’ (CMH; Frank, 1985, 1987b; Yamaguchi, 1985)

  • This is because kin competition, arising from a failure to disperse, is related to the number, rather than the proportion, of a mother’s philopatric offspring

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A number of surprising invariance relationships have emerged from the study of social evolution, whereby a cancelling-out of multiple partial effects of a genetic, ecological or demographic parameter means that it has no net impact upon the evolution of a social behaviour. Under the sexual reproduction model, the quantities described in condition (1) are sex specific: for instance, if we are considering the dispersal of females, Ujt is the probability that a random philopatric female is a daughter of a rank-j mother in a type-t patch.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call