Abstract

AbstractWe measured the He, Ne, and Ar isotopic concentrations and the 10Be, 26Al, 36Cl, and 41Ca concentrations in 56 iron meteorites of groups IIIAB, IIAB, IVA, IC, IIA, IIB, and one ungrouped. From 41Ca and 36Cl data, we calculated terrestrial ages indistinguishable from zero for six samples, indicating recent falls, up to 562 ± 86 ka. Three of the studied meteorites are falls. The data for the other 47 irons confirm that terrestrial ages for iron meteorites can be as long as a few hundred thousand years even in relatively humid conditions. The 36Cl‐36Ar cosmic ray exposure (CRE) ages range from 4.3 ± 0.4 Ma to 652 ± 99 Ma. By including literature data, we established a consistent and reliable CRE age database for 67 iron meteorites. The high quality of the CRE ages enables us to study structures in the CRE age histogram more reliably. At first sight, the CRE age histogram shows peaks at about 400 and 630 Ma. After correction for pairing, the updated CRE age histogram comprises 41 individual samples and shows no indications of temporal periodicity, especially not if one considers each iron meteorite group separately. Our study contradicts the hypothesis of periodic GCR intensity variations (Shaviv 2002, 2003), confirming other studies indicating that there are no periodic structures in the CRE age histogram (e.g., Rahmstorf et al. 2004; Jahnke 2005). The data contradict the hypothesis that periodic GCR intensity variations might have triggered periodic Earth climate changes. The 36Cl‐36Ar CRE ages are on average 40% lower than the 41K‐K CRE ages (e.g., Voshage 1967). This offset can either be due to an offset in the 41K‐K dating system or due to a significantly lower GCR intensity in the time interval 195–656 Ma compared to the recent past. A 40% lower GCR intensity, however, would have increased the Earth temperature by up to 2 °C, which seems unrealistic and leaves an ill‐defined 41K‐K CRE age system the most likely explanation. Finally, we present new 26Al/21Ne and 10Be/21Ne production rate ratios of 0.32 ± 0.01 and 0.44 ± 0.03, respectively.

Highlights

  • An important question in climate change studies is the effect of cosmic rays. Svensmark and FriisChristensen (1997) and Svensmark (1998) claimed that the Earth’s cloud cover is correlated with the cosmic ray flux

  • Our study contradicts the hypothesis of periodic galactic cosmic ray (GCR) intensity variations (Shaviv 2002, 2003), confirming other studies indicating that there are no periodic structures in the cosmic ray exposure (CRE) age histogram (e.g., Rahmstorf et al 2004; Jahnke 2005)

  • The data contradict the hypothesis that periodic GCR intensity variations might have triggered periodic Earth climate changes

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An important question in climate change studies is the effect of cosmic rays. Svensmark and FriisChristensen (1997) and Svensmark (1998) claimed that the Earth’s cloud cover is correlated with the cosmic ray flux. Svensmark and FriisChristensen (1997) and Svensmark (1998) claimed that the Earth’s cloud cover is correlated with the cosmic ray flux. In these pioneering studies, the authors concluded that about 3–4% of the global cloud cover is correlated with the intensity of cosmic rays, which is itself inversely correlated with solar activity. Laut (2003) argued that the correlations between cloud coverage and the galactic cosmic ray (GCR) flux were obtained erroneously. Erlykin et al (2010) argued that there is a negative correlation between GCR intensity and cloud coverage at low altitudes and a positive correlation of solar irradiance with cloud coverage at middle altitudes

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call