Abstract
[...]he participated in the Council of Chalcedon in 451 only as an accuser of Dioscorus, being barred from the deliberations that produced the council’s famous Definition. Only after its promulgation was Theodoret’s case heard; the condition of his restoration was anathematization of Nestorius, to which he acquiesced. [...]Chalcedon exonerated Theodoret as orthodox, an action that would trouble later generations. [...]the union of divine and human in Christ cannot take place at the level of substance or nature—as there is an infinite difference between the uncreated and created natures—but only at the level of personal existence.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
