Abstract
This paper is a critique of Alan Freeman's theory of sequential values. In this approach value is conserved from period to period independently of technical change and disequilibrium, contrary to the traditional view that values are reevaluated at each period depending on the existing conditions of production. Our main criticism is that sequential values fail to account for the devaluation of capital, when the economy is considered globally. Devaluation is possible for individual commodities in Freeman's framework, but the loss of value is always compensated by a corresponding gain for another commodity. The paper also points out a number of puzzling properties of sequential values, in particular the compatibility of increasing values with rising labor productivity. The unusual treatment of fixed capital, in which fixed capital is assimilated to an imperishable raw material, also raises serious problems for Freeman.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
