Abstract

ABSTRACTThis study examines the effect of training to reduce biases and heuristics on the consequence of judgments. We demonstrate that untrained subjects' judgments may systematically yield better consequences than judgments of subjects trained to reduce biases and heuristics. This result implies that educators should use caution when interpreting the findings of biases and heuristics research. In establishing the existence of situations in which biases and heuristics produce better consequences than an unbiased, or normative procedure, we open the larger question of the need for an elaboration of the prescriptive uses of the normative procedures.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call