Abstract

We examine the consequences of a management earnings forecast regulation implemented in a staggered manner. The regulation substantially increases the directly affected firms’ frequency of management forecasts. Nevertheless, approximately 14% of the directly affected firms fail to comply with the regulation (noncompliant firms). The regulation helps increase the stock price informativeness of the directly affected firms that issue a forecast. The regulation also helps increase the stock price informativeness of the noncompliant firms (a spillover), but we find no evidence of a similar spillover for the firms that are not required to issue mandatory forecasts in the post-regulation period.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.