The confounded effects of habitat disturbance at the local, patch and landscape scale on understorey birds of the Atlantic Forest: Implications for the development of landscape-based indicators

Abstract

The search for surrogates of changes in species richness and community structure in fragmented landscapes involves not only the selection of predictors, such as landscape metrics or environmental variables, but also the identification of the spatial scale that is most relevant to the taxa in question. However the heavily intercorrelated nature of many structural features in fragmented landscapes complicates analyses, and the wide variation in species responses prevents the identification of a general trend. In this study, we used a two-tiered hierarchical variation partitioning to identify the unique and shared effects of: 1 – changes in vegetation structure at the plot scale, patch structure (size and shape), and forest cover at the landscape scale; and 2 – variables within these scales; as predictors of species richness and species’ abundances of birds in a fragmented landscape of Atlantic Forest; with the goal of aiding to the development of biodiversity indicators. Birds were sampled with mist-nets with a constant effort of 680 net-h at each of 23 sites, which resulted in almost 2600 captures. At the community level, regression models showed that changes in plot, patch and landscape scale variables explained a large proportion of the variation in species richness, but results from variation partitioning showed that the intercorrelation among predictors was so high that the unique contribution of each was non-significant. Our results point to a relatively large unique effect of local and landscape scale variables at the community level, but we also show that results vary greatly depending on the trophic guild being analysed. At the species level, multiple scale models also presented high explanatory power, however, species responses were so varied that we could not detect a general trend. We conclude that there is no single ‘best’ scale that could function as a proxy for changes in bird communities because each species and functional guild is uniquely affected by the environment, and suggest that efforts should be focused on finding indicators that encompasses all scales and the needs of different taxa.