Abstract
ABSTRACT Do public administrators simultaneously enhance or trade off goals in public programs? Responding to stakeholders’ requests while facing limited budgets poses challenges for public decision-makers in fully improving all goals. This research explores the juxtaposition of conflicting or synergistic goals that administrators might encounter after revising a public program. Using Pennsylvania's Well Plugging Program as a case study, it demonstrates potential changes in goals related to energy site remediation when administrators adopt an objective approach to maximize policy outcomes. The findings indicate that the revised program is expected to increase benefits for impoverished populations near abandoned wells. However, administrators must navigate trade-offs, as the new program may prioritize plugging less environmentally risky wells not selected in the current program. This research sheds light on the simultaneous existence of conflicting and synergistic relations among multiple goals in public programs designed for socially optimal performances.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
