Abstract
Eight pilots with military experience completed a study of human-interaction with automation in a complex and dynamic air-to-ground search and destroy mission. Each pilot completed 32 ten-minute scenarios. Performance measures and subjective measures of mental workload, situation awareness, trust, confidence, and automation reliability were recorded after each scenario. An analysis of the agreement of the subjective measures between scenario types was performed. The results indicated that there was a high level of agreement between all of the subjective measures. Further, the subjective measures were similar, but not identical to the performance measures ranked by scenario type. Design implications are discussed.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
