Abstract
Tragedy has long been considered one of the highest achievements of Eur opean civilization, with the works of Aeschylus, Sophocles, Shakespeare, Racine in prominence. Since the genre has such high standing, comparisons with non-European serious theatre are difficult. George Steiner has stated the domi nant idea straightforwardly: All men are aware of tragedy in life. But tragedy as a form of drama is not universal. Oriental art knows violence, grief, and the stroke of natural or contrived disaster; the Japanese theatre is full of ferocity and ceremonial death. But that representation of personal suffering and heroism which we call tragic drama is distinctive of the Western tradition. A comparison of Western tragedy with Noh and Bunraku drama, however, does not lead to such a sraightforward conclusion. I argue that tragedy is a theatrical, not a reading experience and that the most serious plays in the Japanese tradition?the 'Women' plays of Noh and the third-act pieces of Bunraku?focus on heroes who though caught in a difficult situation consciously choose their paths, which lead often to the extreme edges of human suffering.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Nichibunken Japan review : bulletin of the International Research Center for Japanese Studies
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.