Abstract

The problems that arise in the interpretation of experimental data on chemical carcinogenesis are addressed. In particular, the difficulties in demonstrating negative results are shown to present problems in delineating carcinogens from noncarcinogens. The use of the virtually safe dose estimated under the assumption of low dose linearity is shown to lead to potentially anomalous results if used indiscriminately in bioassays in which no statistically significant increase in tumor occurrence is induced. It is suggested that there is a need to establish an operational definition of negativity in carcinogenesis, with the realization that this definition may be revised in light of new information. The establishment of negativity in aligning data from positive and negative experiments and in considering possible thresholds is also discussed.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call