Abstract

The paper, based on comparative analysis of the legislation of the Russian Federation and acts of the Eurasian Economic Union, examines the legislative definition of the concept of import of goods, different approaches to understanding of the concept under consideration. The legislator’s definition of imports as importation of goods without the obligation to re-export them is not entirely consistent with the description of customs procedures in customs legislation, which gives rise to problems in law enforcement. In particular, the importation of alcoholic products by duty-free shops is considered as imports, which results in the requirement to obtain a license for the purchase (import) of alcohol products. The author highlights the discrepancy between this requirement and the law of the Eurasian Economic Community and the lack of uniformity of judicial practice on this issue. Conflicts of this kind in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the Customs Code of the EAEU should be resolved in favor of international agreements. It is proposed to exclude the obligation to obtain a license to import alcohol products for duty-free shops.

Highlights

  • Термин «импорт» широко используется в экономической и правовой теории и практике. В самом простом варианте под импортом понимается ввоз в страну иностранных товаров, услуг, капиталов.

  • Используемое законодателем определение импорта как ввоза товаров без обязательства об их обратном вывозе не совсем согласуется с описанием таможенных процедур в таможенном законодательстве, что порождает проблемы в правоприменительной практике.

  • The paper, based on comparative analysis of the legislation of the Russian Federation and acts of the Eurasian Economic Union, examines the legislative definition of the concept of import of goods, different approaches

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Термин «импорт» широко используется в экономической и правовой теории и практике. В самом простом варианте под импортом понимается ввоз в страну иностранных товаров, услуг, капиталов. Используемое законодателем определение импорта как ввоза товаров без обязательства об их обратном вывозе не совсем согласуется с описанием таможенных процедур в таможенном законодательстве, что порождает проблемы в правоприменительной практике.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.