Abstract

The ethical and political commitments that underlie scholarship on the prevention of genocide are more obvious than in other fields. Indeed, the concept of genocide was invented as part of Raphael Lemkin’s ambitious project (1933 and 1944) to criminalise a general class of destructive actions against population groups. Since Lemkin’s campaign was extraordinarily successful, for over sixty years genocide has been defined as an international crime. The United Nations, together with the majority of the world’s states who have ratified the 1948 UN Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, are legally bound to ‘prevent and punish’ the acts that have been defined as genocide. We know, however, that this obligation has hardly been fulfilled. Genocide has remained a huge problem of human society during the last sixty years, as the names of countries like Cambodia, Bosnia and Rwanda remind us. While the twentieth century has been called the ‘century of genocide’ (Weitz, 2005), there are those who foresee that the twenty-first century may be just as marred by it (Levene, 2010).KeywordsArmed ConflictInternational CrimeMass MurderGenocide ConventionPhysical DestructionThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.