Abstract
International lawyers refer to concepts such as ‘State immunity’, ‘the high seas’, ‘jus cogens’ and many others as genre-specific – as ‘concepts of international law’. This practice presupposes a definition that can help to distinguish concepts of international law from other concepts used by participants in international legal discourse. This article draws attention to the great complexity of this issue. It starts from the assumption that all genre-specific concepts have an importance for the structuring and development of the branch of activity to which they are said to belong. It arrives at the conclusion that there is in fact not just one way of defining a concept of international law, but several. These definitions are inextricably tied to different conceptions of law. The article argues that it is important that international lawyers openly acknowledge this relationship between different theories of law and different conceptions of an international legal concept. Doing so will enhance the rationality of legal communication and the productivity of international legal discourse.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
