Abstract
The article analyses the second opinion strategy, which involves providing patients with the opportunity to obtain a second (different) opinion from a qualified specialist in cases where patients are not sure of the correctness of their diagnosis or want to consider other treatment options. The use of second opinion in general medicine and in psychiatry is compared. It is pointed out that it is rare to get a second opinion in psychiatry, and there is very little scientific research on this issue in both general and forensic psychiatry. It is concluded that the lack of demand for the concept of second opinion on the part of psychiatrists is associated with many factors, in particular with the prevalence of diagnostic and therapeutic relativism. It is argued that psychiatrists should reconsider their attitude to the concept of second opinion, gain communication skills with patients on the topics of substantiating the correctness of their own diagnostic conclusion and create criteria for an objective assessment of the qualifications of doctors.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
