Abstract
Active and passive reversible sentences were presented to 48 Ss. When the sentences were not reversed, the relation between the logical subject (LS) and the logical object (LO) was pragmatically expected; when they were reversed, it was contrary to expectation. Subjects' task was to extract LS and LO. When response latencies were calculated, it was found that there was a significant reversal but no voice effect. In a second experiment, sentences were again reversible, but the relation between LS and LO was equally expected when sentences were reversed as when they were not. A significant voice but no reversal effect was found. It was concluded that pragmatic expectations are an important cue to comprehension; that they are independent of grammatical order; and that the perceptual prominence of cues in a sentence determines which strategy is employed in comprehension.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
