Abstract
In a pair of recent articles, Brian Left ow and Eleonore Stump off er independent, although similar, accounts of the metaphysics of the Incarnation. Both believe that their Aquinas-inspired theories can off er solutions to the kind of Leibniz’s Law problems that can seem to threaten the logical possibility of this traditional Christian doctrine. In this paper, I’ll have a look at their compositional account of the nature of God incarnate. In the end, I believe their position can be seen to have unacceptable philosophical and theological implications, and that is it inadequate to solve the Leibniz’s law problems that motivate it in the fi rst place.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
