Abstract
The compatibility of rhodamine B dye {N-[9-(2-carboxyphenyl)-6-(diethylamino)-3H-xanthen-3-ylidene]-N-ethyl ethanaminium chloride} with picloram (4-amino-3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinecarboxylic acid) or dicamba (3,6-dichloro-2-methoxybenzoic acid) was evaluated in the laboratory and field. Rhodamine B dye formulation (with or without a surfactant) did not affect dry weight of residue precipitated when mixed with dicamba. Formulated dye precipitated 11% more residue than nonformulated dye when mixed with picloram. Common crupina (Crupina vulgaris Cass. # CJNVU) field plant density was higher after applying a picloram spray solution with nonformulated rhodamine B dye compared to picloram alone. Common crupina density and biomass were higher after application with nonformulated dye and dicamba compared to dicamba alone.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
